Notes and Queries, Number 26, April 27, 1850 by Various
page 15 of 67 (22%)
page 15 of 67 (22%)
![]() | ![]() |
|
The relation we have is evidently only an abridgment or summary made by some Greek, studious of Carthaginian affairs, long subsequent to the time of Hanno; and judging from a passage in Pliny (I. ii. c. 67.), it appears that the ancients were acquainted with other extracts from the original, yet, though its authenticity has been doubted by Strabo and others, there seems to be little reason to question that it is a correct _outline_ of the voyage. That the Carthaginians were oppressors of the people they subjugated may be probable; yet we must not, on such slender grounds as this narration affords, presume that they would wantonly kill and flay _human beings_ to possess themselves of their skins! S.W. Singer April 10. 1850. * * * * * FOLK LORE. _Cook-eels._--Forby derives this from _coquille_, in allusion to their being fashioned like an escallop, in which sense he is borne out by Cotgrave, who has "_Pain coquillé_, a fashion of an hard-crusted loafe, somewhat like our stillyard bunne." I have always taken the word to be "coquerells," from {413} the vending of such buns at the barbarous sport of "throwing at the cock" on Shrove Tuesday. The cock is still commonly called a cockerell in E. Anglia. Perhaps Mr. Wodderspoon will say whether the buns of the present day are fashioned in any particular manner, or whether any "the oldest inhabitant" has any recollection of their being differently fashioned or at all impressed. What, too, are the "_stillyard buns_" of Cotgrave? Are they tea-cakes? The apartment in |
|