Readings on Fascism and National Socialism - Selected by members of the department of philosophy, University of Colorado by Various
page 86 of 173 (49%)
page 86 of 173 (49%)
![]() | ![]() |
|
alone but it is also determined objectively by its
historical, political position. Territory is not merely a field for the exercise of state control but it determines the nature of a people and thereby the historical purpose of the state's activity. England's island position, Italy's Mediterranean position, and Germany's central position between east and west are such historical conditions, which unchangeably form the character of the people.[10] But the new Germany is based upon a "unity and entirety of the people"[11] which does not stop at geographical boundaries: The German people forms a closed community which recognizes no national borders. It is evident that a people has not exhausted its possibilities simply in the formation of a national state but that it represents an independent community which reaches beyond such limits.[12] The State justifies itself only so far as is helps the people to develop itself more fully. In the words of Hitler, quoted by Huber from _Mein Kampf_, "It is a basic principle, therefore, that the state represents not an end but a means. It is a condition for advanced human culture, but not the cause of it ... Its purpose is in the maintenance and advancement of a community of human beings with common physical and spiritual characteristics."[13] Huber continues: In the theory of the folk-Reich _[völkisches Reich_], people and state are conceived as an inseparable unity. The people |
|