Society for Pure English, Tract 02 - On English Homophones by Robert Seymour Bridges;Society for Pure English
page 3 of 94 (03%)
page 3 of 94 (03%)
|
first-born might say, 'Now that you have a son and heir, see that he
gets enough sun and air'.] Homophony is between words as _significant_ sounds, but it is needful to state that homophonous words must be _different_ words, else we should include a whole class of words which are not true homophones. Such words as _draft_, _train_, _board_, have each of them separate meanings as various and distinct as some true homophones; for instance, a draught of air, the miraculous draught of fishes, the draught of a ship, the draft of a picture, or a draught of medicine, or the present draft of this essay, though it may ultimately appear medicinal, are, some of them, quite as distinct objects or notions as, for instance, _vane_ and _vein_ are: but the ambiguity of _draft_, however spelt, is due to its being the name of anything that is _drawn_; and since there are many ways of drawing things, and different things are drawn in different ways, the _same word_ has come to carry very discrepant significations. Though such words as these[2] are often inconveniently and even distressingly ambiguous, they are not homophones, and are therefore excluded from my list: they exhibit different meanings of one word, not the same sound of different words: they are of necessity present, I suppose, in all languages, and corresponding words in independent languages will often develop exactly corresponding varieties of meaning. But since the ultimate origin and derivation of a word is sometimes uncertain, the scientific distinction cannot be strictly enforced. [Footnote 2: Such words have no technical class-name; they are merely extreme examples of the ambiguity common to most words, which grows |
|