Society for Pure English, Tract 02 - On English Homophones by Robert Seymour Bridges;Society for Pure English
page 4 of 94 (04%)
page 4 of 94 (04%)
|
up naturally from divergence of meaning. True homophones are separate
words which have, or have acquired, an illogical fortuitous identity.] [Sidenote: False homophones.] Now, wherever the same derivation of any two same-sounding words is at all doubtful, such words are practically homophones:--and again in cases where the derivation is certainly the same, yet, if the ultimate meanings have so diverged that we cannot easily resolve them into one idea, as we always can _draft_, these also may be practically reckoned as homophones. _Continent_, adjective and substantive, is an example of absolute divergence of meaning, inherited from the Latin; but as they are different parts of speech, I allow their plea of identical derivation and exclude them from my list. On the other hand, the substantive _beam_ is an example of such a false homophone as I include. _Beam_ may signify a balk of timber, or a ray of light. Milton's address to light begins O first created beam and Chaucer has As thikke as motes in the sonne-beam, and this is the commonest use of the word in poetry, and probably in literature: Shelley has Then the bright child the plumèd seraph came |
|