Punch, or the London Charivari, Volume 152, May 2, 1917 by Various
page 34 of 52 (65%)
page 34 of 52 (65%)
|
thinking, the spurs to dull revenge, the self-contempt, the assumed antic
disposition, at times the real mental disturbance--all this was set before us with a fine skill and resource. The "To be or not to be" soliloquy was masterly in its sincerity and restraint; the two broken love passages with _Ophelia_ showed a fine tenderness through the distraught, bitter mood. An ingenious turn was given to that difficult change of weapons in the fencing bout, though I doubt if the Sword Club would wholly have approved the technique of the fencing. Miss GERTRUDE ELLIOTT'S _Ophelia_ in the Mad Scene was full of beauty, sweetness and dignity--and we have so often been bored by our lesser _Ophelias_. A very fine performance. Mr. HOLMAN CLARK was the foolish prating knave, a _Polonius_ robbed of his best speech, and the more consistent therefore. Mr. IRVING is obviously right in his view that _Polonius_ could never by any chance have given any such advice to his truculent son. One may congratulate the producer on the courage of his convictions. But I wonder if the Shakspearean tradition is really dying. The general quality of the performance was, it must be confessed, not inspiring. There was little of the king's divinity hedging _Claudius_; the _Queen_ (an always difficult part) was elaborately unconvincing, though played by a clever actress; _Guildenstern_ and awkward _Rosencrantz_ deserved any fate which awaited them in England. Neither _Laertes_ nor _Horatio_ seemed authentic. But Mr. TOM REYNOLDS' grave-digger had humour and avoided tedium. _Hamlet_ was the thing. T. * * * * * |
|