Violin Mastery - Talks with Master Violinists and Teachers by Frederick H. Martens
page 40 of 204 (19%)
page 40 of 204 (19%)
![]() | ![]() |
|
becomes a portion of himself. Before I even take up my violin I study a
piece thoroughly in score. I read and reread it until I am at home with the composer's thought, and its musical balance and proportion. Then, when I begin to play it, its salient points are already memorized, and the practicing gives me a kind of photographic reflex of detail. After I have not played a number for a long time it fades from my memory--like an old negative--but I need only go over it once or twice to have a clear mnemonic picture of it once more. "Yes, I believe in transcriptions for the violin--with certain provisos," said Mr. Elman, in reply to another question. "First of all the music to be transcribed must lend itself naturally to the instrument. Almost any really good melodic line, especially a _cantilena_, will sound with a fitting harmonic development. Violinists of former days like Spohr, Rode and Paganini were more intent on composing music _out of the violin_! The modern idea lays stress first of all on the _idea_ in music. In transcribing I try to forget I am a violinist, in order to form a perfect picture of the musical idea--its violinistic development must be a natural, subconscious working-out. If you will look at some of my recent transcripts--the Albaniz _Tango_, the negro melody _Deep River_ and Amani's fine _Orientale_--you will see what I mean. They are conceived as pictures--I have not tried to analyze too much--and while so conceiving them their free harmonic background shapes itself for me without strain or effort. A REMINISCENCE OF COLONNE "Conductors with whom I have played? There are many: Hans Richter, who was a master of the baton; Nikisch, one of the greatest in conducting |
|