A Leap in the Dark - A Criticism of the Principles of Home Rule as Illustrated by the - Bill of 1893 by Albert Venn Dicey
page 5 of 237 (02%)
page 5 of 237 (02%)
|
94.--Presumptions on which working of Constitutions depends false, p.
97: 1. Presumption that restrictions do not irritate, p. 98: Its falsehood, ib.--Financial arrangements certain to cause discontent, p. 100.--The Customs, ib.--Charges in favour of England on Ireland, p. 102.--Irish objection to financial proposals, p. 103.--Presumption that Ireland cannot nullify Restrictions. Its falsehood, p. 104.--Summary of criticism, p. 110. CHAPTER III WHY THE NEW CONSTITUTION WILL NOT BE A SETTLEMENT OF THE IRISH QUESTION New Constitution is intended to be final settlement of Irish Question, p. 112: But will not settle Irish Question for three reasons, p. 113: I. New Constitution does not satisfy Ireland or England, ib.: Ireland not satisfied, ib.: New Constitution detested by influential minority, p. 114: Irish Home Rulers not wholly satisfied, p. 115: New Constitution will cause discontent of whole Irish people, p. 118: England not satisfied, p. 119: 2. New Constitution rests on unsound foundation, p. 121: Belfast subjected to Dublin, p. 122: England subjected to Ireland, p. 123: 3. New Constitution based on ambiguity, p. 125.--The nature of the ambiguity, ib.--The result of the ambiguity, ib. The New Constitution cannot last, p. 127.--Irish discontent leading either to Federation or Separation, p. 128.--English discontent threatens reaction, p. 130. CHAPTER IV PLEAS FOR THE NEW CONSTITUTION |
|