A Critical Essay on Characteristic-Writings - From his translation of The Moral Characters of Theophrastus (1725) by Henry Gally
page 22 of 53 (41%)
page 22 of 53 (41%)
|
Vices in common Conversation; but yet _Theophrastus_ has concluded his
Character of Loquacity, with the same Stroke which begins that of an ill-timâd Behaviour; because thoâ these Vices are of a different Nature, yet do they not exclude each other; and the Actions of Men manifestly prove, that they are frequently to be found in the same Subject. The nice Reader therefore, instead of being offended to find the peculiar Features of one Vice interspersâd in the Character of another, ought, on the contrary, to admire the Judgment and Accuracy of _Theophrastus_ in this Respect: For this Mixture does not proceed from Inaccuracy, but is founded in Nature: And âtis the Work of a sagacious Head, as well to discover the near Relations that are between different things, as to separate those Things, which by Nature are nearly related, but yet are really distinct. The Beauty of every Kind of Writing arises from the Conformity which it bears to Nature; and therefore the Excellency of _Characteristic-Writings_ must consist in exact Representations of human Nature.--This Harmony between Art and Nature may be callâd Justice: And thoâ the Boundaries of it may be more extensive in those Works, in which a greater Range is allowâd to the Imagination, yet still, Invention and Fiction must be admitted in _Characteristic- Writings_, when the Characters designâd are of a general Nature; for then the Writer does not copy from an individual Original, and all the Extravagances of Nature are natural, when they are well represented. It requires, I own, a great deal of Penetration to hit exactly this Point of Reality: But then it must be confessâd, that as the great |
|