A Critical Essay on Characteristic-Writings - From his translation of The Moral Characters of Theophrastus (1725) by Henry Gally
page 35 of 53 (66%)
page 35 of 53 (66%)
|
[R: C. des Biers de Fortune. sub fin.]
âTis not enough that a Character be drawn conformable to that Existence which it really has, or probably may have in Nature: It must further be cloathâd in proper Sentiments, and expressâd in a simple and natural Style. But Mr. _de la Bruyere_, considerâd as a Writer of Characters, is too affected in his way of Thinking, and too artificial in the Turn of his Expressions. The previous Apology which he made for himself in this Point, is so far from the Purpose, that nothing is more so. Recollecting, [S]says he, that amongst the Writings ascribâd to _Theophrastus_ by _Diogenes Laertius_, there is one which bears the Title of _Proverbs_, i.e. of loose unconnected Observations, and that the most considerable Book of Morality, that ever was made, bears that Name in the sacred Writings; we have been excited by such great Examples to imitate, according to our Capacity, a like Way of Writing concerning Manners. --âTis true, that in the Catalogue of _Theophrastus _ his Works, preservâd by [T]_Diogenes Laertius_, there is one Book under the Title ÏεÏὶ ÏαÏοιμιῶν concerning _Proverbs_: But that, probably, was nothing but a Collection of some of those short, remarkable, useful, pithy Sayings, which are of common Use in the World, and which every Nation has peculiar to it self. However, thoâ we cannot exactly tell, what the Nature of that Performance was, because the Book is now lost, yet we are certain, on the other Hand, that the Design of _Solomon_ was not to write Characters, but to deliver some Maxims of Morality by way of Advice and Instruction. So that for a professâd Writer of Characters, |
|