Preface to the Works of Shakespeare (1734) by Lewis Theobald
page 25 of 70 (35%)
page 25 of 70 (35%)
|
Beauties of those two Poems of _MILTON_, intitled, _LâAllegro_ and
_Il Pensoroso_, are obvious to all Readers, because the Descriptions are the most poetical in the World; yet there is a peculiar Beauty in those two excellent Pieces, that will much enhance the Value of them to the more capable Readers; which has never, I think, been observâd. The Images, in each Poem, which he raises to excite Mirth and Melancholy, are exactly the same, only shewn in different Attitudes. Had a Writer, less acquainted with Nature, given us two Poems on these Subjects, he would have been sure to have sought out the most contrary Images to raise these contrary Passions. And, particularly, as _Shakespeare_, in the Passage I am now commenting, speaks of these different Effects in Musick; so _Milton_ has brought it into each Poem as the Exciter of each Affection: and lest we should mistake him, as meaning that different Airs had this different Power, (which every Fidler is proud to have you understand,) He gives the Image of those self-same Strains that _Orpheus_ used to regain _Eurydice_, as proper both to excite Mirth and Melancholy. But _Milton_ most industriously copied the Conduct of our _Shakespeare_, in Passages that shewâd an intimate Acquaintance with Nature and Science. [Sidenote: Shakespeareâs _Knowledge of Nature_.] I have not thought it out of my Province, whenever Occasion offerâd, to take notice of some of our Poetâs grand Touches of Nature: Some, that do not appear superficially such; but in which he seems the most deeply instructed; and to which, no doubt, he has so much owâd that happy Preservation of his _Characters_, for which he is justly celebrated. If he was not acquainted with the Rule as deliverâd by _Horace_, his own admirable Genius piercâd into the Necessity of |
|