Preface to the Works of Shakespeare (1734) by Lewis Theobald
page 40 of 70 (57%)
page 40 of 70 (57%)
|
particular Actor. Hence much Confusion and Impropriety has attended,
and embarrasâd, the Business and Fable. For there ever have been, and ever will be in Playhouses, a Set of assuming Directors, who know better than the Poet himself the Connexion and Dependance of his Scenes; where Matter is defective, or Superfluities to be retrenchâd; Persons, that have the Fountain of _Inspiration_ as peremptorily in them, as Kings have That of _Honour_. To these obvious Causes of Corruption it must be added, that our Author has lain under the Disadvantage of having his Errors propagated and multiplied by Time: because, for near a Century; his Works were republishâd from the faulty Copies without the assistance of any intelligent Editor: which has been the Case likewise of many a _Classic_ Writer. [Sidenote: The Editorâs Drift and Method.] [Sidenote*: Difference betwixt this Edition and Dr. _Bentley_âs _Milton_.] The Nature of any Distemper once found has generally been the immediate Step to a Cure. _Shakespeare_âs Case has in a great Measure resembled That of a corrupt _Classic_; and, consequently, the Method of Cure was likewise to bear a Resemblance. By what Means, and with what Success, this Cure has been effected on ancient Writers, is too well known, and needs no formal Illustration. The Reputation consequent on Tasks of that Nature invited me to attempt the Method here; with this View, the Hopes of restoring to the Publick their greatest Poet in his Original Purity: after having so long lain in a Condition that was a Disgrace to common Sense. To this End I have venturâd on a Labour, that is the first Assay of |
|