The New York Times Current History of the European War, Vol. 1, January 9, 1915 - What Americans Say to Europe by Various
page 19 of 499 (03%)
page 19 of 499 (03%)
|
correspondence. If Germany were as ignorant as her Ambassador at London
affected to be of the Austrian policy and ultimatum, and if Germany was not then instigating and supporting Austria in its perilous course, why should the German Chancellor have served this threatening notice upon England, France, and Russia, that Austria must be left free to make war upon Servia, and that any attempt to intervene in behalf of the weaker nation would "bring consequences impossible to measure"? [German "White Paper," Annex 1B.] A few days later the Imperial Chancellor sent to the Confederated Governments of Germany a _confidential communication_ in which he recognized the possibility that Russia might feel it a duty "to take the part of Servia in her dispute with Austria-Hungary." Why, again, if Austria's case was so clearly justified? The Imperial Chancellor added that "if Russia feels constrained to take sides with Servia in this conflict, she certainly has a right to do it," but added that if Russia did this it would in effect challenge the integrity of the Austro-Hungarian Monarchy, and that Russia would therefore alone-- "bear the responsibility if a European war arises from the Austro-Servian question, _which all the rest of the great European powers wish to localize_." In this significant confidential communication the German Chancellor declares the strong interest which Germany had in the punishment of |
|