A Study of Pueblo Pottery as Illustrative of Zuñi Culture Growth. - Fourth Annual Report of the Bureau of Ethnology to the Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution, 1882-83, Government Printing Office, Washington, 1886, pages 467-522 by Frank Hamilton Cushing
page 24 of 59 (40%)
page 24 of 59 (40%)
![]() | ![]() |
|
preferable, the discrepancy is explained, since the name _Ã mush ton
ne_ is from _i´ mu_, to sit, and _tóm me_, a tube. This indicates, too, why the basket-bottle was not displaced by the earthen bottle. While the former continued in use for bringing water from a distance, the latter was employed for storing it. As the fragile earthen vessels were much more readily made and less liable to become tainted, they were exclusively used as receptacles, removing the necessity of the tedious manufacture of a large number of the basket-bottles. Again, as the pitcher was thus used exclusively as a receptacle, to be set aside in household or camp, the name _ô mush ton ne_ sufficed without the interpolation _te_--"earthenware"--to distinguish it as of _terra cotta_, instead of osiery. [Illustration: FIG. 521.--Water-bottle of corrugated ware, showing double handle.] [Illustration: FIG. 522.--Water-bottle of corrugated ware, showing plain bottom.] POTTERY INFLUENCED BY LOCAL MINERALS. Before discussing the origin of other forms, it may be well to consider briefly some influences, more or less local, which, in addition to the general effect of gourd-forms in suggesting basket-types and of the latter in shaping earthenware, had considerable bearing on the development of ceramic art in the Southwest, pushing it to higher degrees of perfection and diversity in some parts than in others. |
|