Times for times. Also where the employment or omission of a
capital is plainly due to misprinting, as too frequently in the
1673 edition, I silently make the correction. Examples are,
notes for Notes in Sonnet xvii. l. 13; Anointed for anointed in
Psalm ii. l.12.

In regard to punctuation I have followed the old printers except
in obvious misprints, and followed them also, as far as possible,
in their distribution of roman and italic type and in the grouping
of words and lines in the various titles. To follow them exactly
was impossible, as the books are so very different in size.

At this point the candid reader may perhaps ask what advantage
is gained by presenting these poems to modern readers in the
dress of a bygone age. If the question were put to me I should
probably evade it by pointing out that Mr. Frowde is issuing an
edition based upon this, in which the spelling is frankly that of
to-day. But if the question were pressed, I think a sufficient
answer might be found. To begin with, I should point out that
even Prof. Masson, who in his excellent edition argues the
point and decides in favour of modern spelling, allows that there
are peculiarities of Milton's spelling which are really significant,
and ought therefore to be noted or preserved. But who is to
determine exactly which words are spelt according to the poet's
own instructions, and which according to the printer's whim? It
is notorious that in Paradise Lost some words were spelt upon a
deliberate system, and it may very well happen that in the
volume of minor poems which the poet saw through the press in
1645, there were spellings no less systematic. Prof. Masson
makes a great point of the fact that Milton's own spelling,