Historic Doubts Relative To Napoleon Buonaparte by Richard Whately
page 45 of 60 (75%)
page 45 of 60 (75%)
|
[17] The supposed history from which the above extracts are given, is published entire in the work called _Historic Certainties._ [18] "I desire any one to lay his hand upon his heart, and after serious consideration declare whether he thinks that the falsehood of such a book, supported by such testimony, would be more extraordinary and miraculous than all the miracles it relates."â_Hume's Essay on Miracles_, p. 200, 12mo; p. 206, 8vo, 1767; p. 131, 8vo, 1817. Let it be borne in mind that Hume (as I have above remarked) continually employs the term "miracle" and "prodigy" to signify anything that is highly _improbable_ and _extraordinary._ [19] "The wise lend a very academic faith to every report which favours the passion of the reporter, whether it magnifies his _country_, his family, or himself."â_Hume's Essay on Miracles_, p. 144, 12mo; p. 200, 8vo, 1767; p. 126, 8vo, 1817. [20] "Nothing can be more contrary than such a philosophy (the academic or sceptical) to the supine indolence of the mind, its rash arrogance, its lofty pretensions, and its superstitious credulity."â_Fifth Essay_, p. 68, 12mo; p. 41, 8vo, 1817. [21] See _Hume's Essay on Miracles_, pp. 189, 191, 195, 12mo; pp. 193, 197, 201, 202, 8vo, 1767; pp. 124, 125, 126, 8vo, 1817. [22] See _Edinburgh Review_ for October, 1842, p. 162. [23] It is well know with how much learning and ingenuity the |
|