Historic Doubts Relative To Napoleon Buonaparte by Richard Whately
page 44 of 60 (73%)
page 44 of 60 (73%)
|
tells me that he saw a dead man restored to life, I immediately
consider with myself whether it be more _probable_ that this person should either deceive or be deceived, or that the fact which he relates should really have happened. I weigh the one _miracle_ against the other."â_Hume's Essay on Miracles_, pp. 176, 177, 12mo; p. 182, 8vo, 1767; p. 115, 8vo, 1817. See also a passage above quoted from the same essay, where he speaks of "the _miraculous_ accounts of travellers;" evidently using the word in this sense. Perhaps it was superfluous to cite authority for applying the term "miracle" to whatever is "highly improbable;" but it is important to the students of Hume, to be fully aware that he uses those two expressions as synonymous; since otherwise they would mistake the meaning of that passage which he justly calls "a general maxim worthy of your attention." [15] "Events may be so extraordinary that they can hardly be established by testimony. We would not give credit to a man who would affirm that he saw a hundred dice thrown in the air, and that they all fell on the same faces."â_Edin. Review_, Sept. 1814, p. 327. Let it be observed, that the instance here given is _miraculous_ in no other sense but that of being highly _improbable_. [16] "If the spirit of religion join itself to the love of wonder, there is an end of common sense; and human testimony in these circumstances loses all pretensions to authority."â_Hume's Essay on Miracles_, p. 179, 12mo; p. 185, 8vo, 1767; p. 117, 8vo, 1817. |
|