repetition.

An armistice was concluded on March 5th, 1881, which led up to a
peace on the 23rd of the same month. The Government, after yielding
to force what it had repeatedly refused to friendly
representations, made a clumsy compromise in their settlement. A
policy of idealism and Christian morality should have been thorough
if it were to be tried at all. It was obvious that if the
annexation were unjust, then the Transvaal should have reverted to
the condition in which it was before the annexation, as defined by
the Sand River Convention. But the Government for some reason would
not go so far as this. They niggled and quibbled and bargained
until the State was left as a curious hybrid thing such as the
world has never seen. It was a republic which was part of the
system of a monarchy, dealt with by the Colonial Office, and
included under the heading of 'Colonies' in the news columns of the
'Times.' It was autonomous, and yet subject to some vague
suzerainty, the limits of which no one has ever been able to
define. Altogether, in its provisions and in its omissions, the
Convention of Pretoria appears to prove that our political affairs
were as badly conducted as our military in this unfortunate year of
1881.

It was evident from the first that so illogical and contentious an
agreement could not possibly prove to be a final settlement, and
indeed the ink of the signatures was hardly dry before an agitation
was on foot for its revision. The Boers considered, and with
justice, that if they were to be left as undisputed victors in the
war then they should have the full fruits of victory. On the other
hand, the English-speaking colonies had their allegiance tested to