The Roman Pronunciation of Latin - Why we use it and how to use it by Frances Ellen Lord
page 34 of 74 (45%)
page 34 of 74 (45%)
![]() | ![]() |
|
In Donatus we have the same fact stated, with the same reason:
[Keil. v. IV. p. 442.] Quod magis aurium indicio quam artis ratione colligimus. Thus we find numeral abverbs and others ending either in _iens_ or _ies_, as _centiens_ or _centies_, _decies_ or _deciens_, _millies_ or _milliens_, _quotiens_ or _quoties_, _totiens_ or _toties_. Other words, in like manner, participles and nouns, are written either with or without the N before S, as _contunsum_ or _contusum_, _obtunsus_ or _obtusus_, _thesaurus_ or _thensaurus_ (the _ens_ is regularly represented in Greek by [Greek transliteration: aes]); _infans_ or _infas_, _frons_ or _fros_. In late Latin the N was frequently dropped in participle endings. Donatus says that this nasal sound of N should be strenuously observed: [Keil. v. IV. p. 442.] Illud vehementissime observare debemus, ut _con_ et _in_ quotiensque post se habent S vel F litteram, videamus quemadmodum pronuntientur. Plerumque enim non observantes in barbarismos incurrimus. GN in the terminations _gnus_, _gna_, _gnum_, has, according to Priscian, the power to lengthen the penultimate vowel. [Prisc. I.] _Gnus_ quoque, vel _gna_, vel _gnum_, terminantia, longam habent vocalem penultimam; ut a _regno_, _regnum_; a _sto_, _stagnum_; a _bene_, _benignus_; a _male_, _malignus_; ab _abiete_, _abiegnus_; _privignus_; _Pelignus_. (Perhaps the liquid sound, as in canon.) |
|