Scientific American Supplement, No. 324, March 18, 1882 by Various
page 64 of 143 (44%)
page 64 of 143 (44%)
![]() | ![]() |
|
H_{2}C/
\ O / OC\ H_{3}C/ Or condensed-- H_{5}C_{2} \ }O H_{3}C_{2}O/ Or H_{5}C_{2}O.C_{2}H_{3}O, or H_{5}C_{2}.C_{2}H_{3}O_{2}. Now each of these two latter formulae is a partial formula, each represents a one-sided view; it is justifiable if you use both, but unfair if you use only one. We now come to the question as to the existence or non-existence of two distinct classes of compounds, one in which the atoms are combined directly or indirectly with each other, and the other in which a group of atoms is combined as an integer with some other group of atoms, without any atomic connection by so-called molecular combination. These two modes of combination are essentially distinct. The question is not one of degree. Are there any facts to support this theory that one set of compounds is formed in one way, another in a different way? Take the case of the sulphates: Starting with SO_{3}, we can replace one atom of O by HO_{2}, and obtain SO_{2}(HO)_{2} or H_{2}SO_{4}; replacing a second atom, we get SO(HO)_{4} or H_{4}SO_{5}, glacial sulphuric acid, a perfectly definite body corresponding to a definite class of sulphates, |
|